English | EN 
For as long as we have been measuring cleverness, IQ has been the trusty yardstick for spotting “bright sparks.” People with high IQs often shine in academics, research, and invention — Einstein, of course, remains the eternal poster child. On the other hand, Emotional Intelligence (EQ) tends to run the show on the social stage. Performers, leaders, and those with natural charisma often thrive not because of their equations, but because of their empathy. They do not need to split the atom to split a room with laughter or solve relativity to make a crowd relate.
But here’s the twist: genuine success often comes from a rare blend of both IQ and EQ. And in my world, consulting, this isn’t just a “nice-to-have”; it’s absolutely essential. IQ might help you solve the problem, but EQ helps you solve it in a way people actually welcome. Without the balance, you are either technically brilliant but socially tone-deaf, or empathetic but ineffective. The sweet spot lies in marrying the two, where ideas and emotions both get a seat at the table.
Now, as we march deeper into the AI revolution, the same principle applies. Machines are mastering the IQ side of things — crunching numbers, analysing data, spotting patterns, and generating insights faster than any of us could scribble them on the back of an envelope. But can they read the room? Can they tell when a customer is frustrated, when a patient is anxious, or when a student is silently struggling? That’s where AI needs more than just brains. It needs a little heart.
The rise of Large Language Models, Generative AI, and Autonomous AI has been nothing short of dazzling. Industries are being reshaped faster than you can say “automation,” and companies everywhere are rushing to bolt these shiny new engines onto their business models. But amidst the fireworks, there’s a lurking danger: hype without humanity. A solution may be technically brilliant, but if it leaves the user cold, confused, or worse, leave them more frustrated than before, then what have we really achieved?
The answer lies in Emotional Intelligence for AI, or what some are calling “emotion AI.” For any system that interacts directly with humans, this is becoming the real differentiator. Take the humble chatbot as an example. It’s one thing for it to spit out the right answer. But a chatbot that chirps “Have a great day!” when you’re raging over a billing error isn’t helpful. It’s like being offered a cheery umbrella while you are already soaked through. An emotionally aware AI would recognise frustration in your language or tone, adjust its register, and calmly offer an immediate solution. It would not be about “feeling” in the human sense, but about making the interaction more attuned, useful, and human-like.
The importance of weaving emotional intelligence into AI extends across industries. In healthcare, imagine a virtual consultation where the system does not just recite medical facts but also offers reassurance when it senses patient anxiety. In education, tutoring systems that detect boredom or stress could adapt their style on the fly, making learning less of a slog. Even in recruitment, emotionally intelligent AI could help level the playing field, reducing bias and improving candidate experience. In each case, it’s not the raw brainpower of the machine that matters most, but the ability to interact in ways that feel natural and respectful.
And this is not just about keeping customers happy or smoothing over awkward interactions. Adding a layer of emotional intelligence to AI builds trust. Many people are still sceptical of these technologies, and with good reason. If AI feels robotic in the worst sense — cold, detached, tone-deaf — then adoption will always be uphill. But if people feel “understood,” not just “processed,” then trust grows, and with trust comes wider acceptance.
As the old saying goes, “No economic development is development without social development.” I would argue the same applies to technology: no AI can truly be considered successful without EI. The future isn’t about designing machines that are merely clever. It’s about designing ones that are considerate. Not replacing emotion but respecting it. Not mimicking empathy but enabling interactions that feel empathetic.
The challenge for us as an industry is to step beyond the thrill of raw intelligence and aim for authentic intelligence — where IQ meets EQ. If we can manage that, the rewards will be immense: richer user experiences, stronger customer loyalty, greater trust, and more ethical systems. It won’t be easy, but the best innovations rarely are.
It’s time for our machines to not just have intelligence, but also Emotion.