Skip to Content

THE AI AUGMENTED QA ENGINEER

August 29, 2025
Steve De Smet

Functional testing is dead – long live functional testing!

While most of the focus in QA has tended to go to test automation in recent years, functional testing still plays a critical role in ensuring that software behaves as expected. While applications and IT ecosystems are growing more complex, traditional functional QA is being put under pressure.

To combat this, Gen AI can be a powerful tool in your QA engineers’ kit. So how exactly can an AI-augmented QA engineer outshine their traditional counterparts?

1. Smarter Test Case Generation

Taking in new requirements and creating test cases from scratch can often be time-consuming and repetitive. AI can analyze requirements, user stories, and historical defect data to automatically generate relevant test cases.

By utilizing special fit-for-purpose AI models, all industry knowledge and best practices are automatically incorporated: bodies of knowledge, test techniques, latest insights, intelligent preconfigured prompts, etc.

Utilization of such tools decreases manual effort and ensures broader, more consistent coverage across the application, while the QA engineer can focus on using their business knowledge to review and finetune scripts for optimal efficiency.

2. Enhanced Risk-Based Prioritization

Provided the right data is available, AI can help identify which functional areas are most prone to failure. By analyzing usage patterns, code changes, and past incidents, potential failure hotspots can be found. This allows QA engineers to enhance their risk-based approach and focus their effort where it matters most, while freeing up time for other tasks such as targeted exploratory testing.

3. Improved Requirement Traceability

Something tedious and often overlooked is traceability and test coverage. AI can assist the functional tester in mapping test cases to functional requirements and highlight potential coverage gaps or any other inconsistencies. This ensures that all business-critical functionality is covered and there are no blind spots in the application coverage.

4. Enhanced Exploratory Testing

If production data is available, AI can analyze user behavior and system logs, and suggest exploratory paths that are unknown to the team or may not be obvious through manual analysis. This supports testers in stepping away from only looking at existing requirements and provides them with real-use insights, uncovering potential edge cases and behaviors that standard tests might miss.

5. Continuous feedback and fine tuning

Because AI enables real-time analysis of test results, it helps the team in quickly identifying regressions and adapting their test strategies. If the model detects an uptick in issues in a particular area, it can guide the tester to dedicate more time on it, explore additional cases, etc. Inversely, the AI model might optimize the tester’s time by decreasing the coverage in historically issue-free areas of the application. Small tweaks like this can be a big difference maker in tester efficiency.

To summarize with a cliché that has been overly popular lately: Generative AI won’t replace functional testers – but AI-augmented functional testers will replace traditional manual testers, who stick to their old way of working.
The QA engineers who understand how to get the most out of Gen AI will outshine their colleagues in speed, efficiency, and quality of work.

PS: Take a look at our Gen AI Amplifier by Sogeti  . Accumulating all of our in-house best practices and knowledge into a one-stop-platform to augment our QA professionals. Our Gen AI amplifier speeds up test creation, optimizes coverage, maximizes tester efficiency, and ultimately boosts application quality.

About the author

SogetiLabs Country Lead | Belgium
Steve is a strong advocate of Quality Engineering throughout all phases of the SDLC. With almost a decade of background in Digital Assurance & Quality Engineering, he has gathered experience through various roles within the craft: Test analyst, Test Manager, Program Quality Manager, etc.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Slide to submit