English | EN 
I’ll admit it, I never thought I’d use “Python” and “carbon emissions” in the same sentence. But here we are. Because believe it or not, the code we write, those elegant functions, those messy loops, that guilty little chunk of spaghetti logic we copy-pasted at 2 a.m. actually has a carbon footprint. And that footprint? It’s not the same across all languages.
Crazy, right? I know. When I first stumbled on the idea, I brushed it off like it was the tech equivalent of measuring how loud fonts are. But the deeper I dug, the more it made sense. Code doesn’t live in a vacuum. It runs on servers. Those servers use energy. Some languages need more energy to do the same thing. Some chew through resources like a toddler with a bag of marshmallows. Others sip politely, as if raised in a Scandinavian café.
So, are there sustainable programming languages? Yeah. Some are better than others. But it’s not as simple as saying “use X, save the planet.” It depends. On what you’re doing. How you’re doing it. And who’s running your code.
Let’s unpack this.
Back in 2017, a research team from the University of Lisbon published one of the first real comparisons of programming languages in terms of energy consumption, execution time, and memory usage. They tested twenty-seven popular languages across ten problems. The results were… spicy. C, C++, and Rust came out looking like lean, green computing machines. They were fast and light. Python, Ruby, and Perl? Not so much. Think of it like comparing a race car to a minivan dragging a trailer of uncompiled regrets.
Here’s where it gets interesting. Energy use isn’t just about how fast your program runs. It’s about how it runs. Languages like C and Rust are compiled. That means they’re turned into machine code before they run. No middleman. No nonsense. Just you and the bare metal. Interpreted languages like Python or JavaScript run through a layer that interprets your code on the fly, which takes more time and power. Kind of like ordering fast food through five drive-thrus just to get to the fries.
But, and this is important, that doesn’t mean you should stop using Python. Or throw your Ruby code into a compost bin. Sustainability in software isn’t just about raw energy consumption. It’s also about developer productivity, system efficiency, and context. Python is famously easy to write and maintain. If a few developers can build something in Python in a week that would take a team of ten a month in C, that’s time saved, labor saved, and potentially a whole lot of computing power saved over time. A fast program that never ships is not more sustainable.
Still, performance matters. If your code is going to run millions of times per day, like powering a real-time recommendation engine or crunching search queries, then yes, the choice of language suddenly matters a lot. Every inefficiency gets amplified. At that scale, choosing a low-energy language like Rust or Go can literally reduce your infrastructure footprint. That’s fewer servers, lower energy bills, and less cooling needed in a data center somewhere in Frankfurt.
I know what you’re thinking: does this mean Java is the villain? Not really. Java sits somewhere in the middle. It’s not as fast as C, but it’s way more efficient than Python. And modern JVMs have gotten pretty clever about optimizing code at runtime. So Java can perform surprisingly well, especially if you know how to tune it. But again, it’s all in the use case.
Now, let’s talk about garbage collection. No, not the bins behind your house. We’re talking about how some languages automatically manage memory. Languages like Java, C#, and Go have built-in garbage collectors. They free up memory for you. Sounds nice, right? And it is. But garbage collection adds overhead. It uses CPU cycles. It burns power. It can create hiccups in execution. In contrast, languages like C++ or Rust require the programmer to manage memory manually, which is harder, but often more efficient.
That trade-off again. Ease vs. efficiency.
And then there’s JavaScript. The language that somehow powers most of the web and yet still makes grown developers cry. It’s interpreted, loosely typed, and often bloated. But it’s also fast to develop with, and it runs where users are, on their browsers. That’s important. Running code on the client side shifts the computing burden away from centralized servers. Done right, that can actually reduce backend energy use. Done wrong, it just wastes battery and irritates users. So… tread carefully.
Okay. Big picture time.
Sustainable software isn’t about picking one perfect language. It’s about writing code that’s efficient for its context. Sometimes that means using Rust to build a hyper-efficient service that runs at the edge. Other times it means writing a Python script that solves a huge business problem in one hour instead of building a multi-year system in a leaner language.
It also means thinking about your runtime environment. Are you hosting on a green cloud provider? Are you using serverless functions that shut down when not in use? Are your systems scaled to demand or always-on? Are you caching aggressively? These things can matter more than the language you write in.
And then, of course, there’s the rise of AI and the computational monster it’s become. Training a single large language model can emit more carbon than five cars over their entire lifetime. A lot of this is written in Python. But it’s not Python’s fault. It’s about scale, model design, and hardware. So optimizing languages and systems at that level is a whole different game.
The irony? Most of us don’t write code at that scale. We write boring old apps. APIs. Web tools. Internal dashboards. So we have choices. We can be thoughtful. We can measure. Use efficient libraries. Profile code. Avoid unnecessary loops. Reuse data. Optimize queries. Choose languages that make sense for the job and use patterns that keep things lean.
I like to think of it like The Mandalorian. You don’t win every fight by being the strongest. You win by knowing your gear, your terrain, and when to move fast versus when to hide in the shadows. The sustainable programmer is like that. Efficient. Clever. Always looking for the quiet win.
So are there sustainable programming languages? Sort of. Some are clearly more efficient than others in raw terms. But sustainability isn’t just about watts per line of code. It’s about outcomes. It’s about total system impact. It’s about long-term thinking.
The truth? You don’t need to rewrite your stack in Rust tomorrow. But maybe start measuring. Be curious. Profile more often. Think about what your code is really costing, not just in dollars, but in degrees. The more we build with that mindset, the better off we all are.
Because in the end, every line of code has consequences. And just maybe, the greenest line of code… is the one you didn’t have to write.