English | EN 
AI models are scaling at a pace that traditional computing architectures were never designed to handle. While much of today’s conversation focuses on larger models and better algorithms, the real constraint and opportunity lies deeper in the stack.
AI is increasingly becoming a hardware problem.
The next phase of AI progress will be shaped less by software ingenuity and more by how intelligently we design the systems that execute these models.
Why General-Purpose Hardware Is Hitting Its Limits?
CPUs and GPUs have powered AI remarkably well, but they come with fundamental trade-offs.
Modern deep learning workloads are dominated by dense and sparse matrix multiplications, high-bandwidth memory access, massive parallelism, and strict latency and power constraints. GPUs excel at parallel compute, but they are still general-purpose accelerators.
As models grow into hundreds of billions and now trillions of parameters, inefficiencies become impossible to ignore. The bottlenecks are no longer just compute. They are memory bandwidth, data movement, power efficiency, and interconnect latency.
Custom AI Chips: Purpose-Built for the Workload
This is why we are seeing a strong shift toward domain-specific architectures for AI.
Custom AI chips, often NPUs, TPUs, or specialized accelerators, are designed around how neural networks actually execute. Instead of optimizing for flexibility, they optimize for throughput and latency.
This shift is not only about performance. It is about economic viability. At scale, even small efficiency gains translate into significant reductions in infrastructure cost and energy consumption.
Inference Is the New Battleground
Training large models gets the headlines, but inference is where AI meets the real world.
Serving AI at scale requires predictable latency, high availability, low power consumption, and tight cost control. Custom hardware allows models to be distilled, quantized, and optimized specifically for inference paths.
The result is real-time intelligence embedded directly into devices, while cloud infrastructure is used more selectively reserved for large-scale training, retraining, and burst workloads rather than indiscriminate, always-on inference.
Where Quantum Computing Fits In
Quantum computing is not a replacement for classical AI hardware, but it may become a strategic accelerator for specific problem classes.
Quantum systems show promise in combinatorial optimization, sampling-based methods, and high-dimensional state exploration. In the context of AI, this could eventually impact model optimization, probabilistic learning, and complex scientific simulations.
The most realistic path forward is hybrid systems, where classical AI hardware handles deterministic workloads and quantum processors assist with mathematically intractable subproblems.
What we are witnessing is not just a hardware upgrade, but a re-architecture of the entire AI stack.
The most successful AI systems will be those where models are designed with hardware constraints in mind, compilers understand both neural networks and silicon, and hardware is built around real workloads rather than theoretical peak performance.
This tight feedback loop between hardware and software will define long-term competitive advantage in AI.