English | EN 
Script failures aren’t setbacks — they’re signals. When embraced, they lead to stronger automation and better software quality.
As we all know, test automation is changing fast. While we are caught up in the hive and hype of AI and agentic advancements, it is essential to focus on ensuring our testing processes remain robust and reliable.
Tools like low-code platforms and new advancements in AI and smart agents are helping teams move quicker and cut costs. But in all this excitement, are we forgetting the basics?
Testing is not just about speed or automation – it’s about making sure the product works well. Sadly, testing is still seen as a cost, and script failures are often treated as problems to hide. In this post, I want to share my point of view about why script failures are helpful and how they can make our automation stronger.
Why Script Failures Are Important
When a test script fails, it’s easy to think something went wrong. But these failures are actually useful. They help us:
Find real bugs: Failures show where the system isn’t working as expected.
Spot missing tests: They reveal gaps in what we’re testing.
Test the system’s strength: Failures often show edge cases or rare issues.
Improve over time: Fixing failures helps both the app and the test suite get better.
If we ignore or hide these failures, we risk missing serious problems that could affect users later.
The Problem with Focusing Only on Cost
Modern tools can save time and money — but if we only focus on cost, we might end up choosing the wrong approach: This mindset can lead to quality issues, creating software that looks fine on the surface but has hidden issues.
1. Misaligned Expectations: While low-code tools accelerate test creation, they still require thoughtful design and maintenance. Without a solid strategy, teams may build automation that’s fast to develop but hard to scale or adapt over time.
2. Limited testing: Teams may only test the “happy path” and miss important edge cases.
3. Overreliance Without Context: AI-powered tools can boost efficiency, but they work best when guided by human insight. Domain knowledge and critical thinking are still essential to design meaningful, reliable tests that align with real-world scenarios.
4. Missed Learning Opportunities: Viewing failures as setbacks can prevent teams from uncovering valuable insights. Embracing failures as part of the learning process helps improve both the product and the testing strategy over time.
How to Use Failures to Advantage
Instead of fearing failures, we should use them to make our systems better:
Root Cause Analysis – Investigate test failures. Was it a bug, a test issue, or an environment problem? Finding the real reason helps prevent it from happening again.
Sharing Feedback — Failures provide valuable feedback to developers. This builds teamwork and helps fix issues early.
Strengthen Your Tests — Failures often show weak or missing test cases. Fixing them makes the test suite stronger.
Staying Up to Date— Software changes fast. Failures help us to keep tests aligned with new features or updates.
Build a Strong Foundation for Automation
New tools are great, but they work best when built on solid basics. Here’s how to stay grounded:
Setting clear goals: Know what you want from testing— speed, coverage, reliability and choose tools that support those goals.
Invest in people: Tools are only as good as the people using them. Train your team and build a culture that values quality.
Design smart tests: Focus on tests that are easy to maintain and cover real business needs.
Keep improving: Review your tools and processes often. Make changes as your product and team grow.Final Thoughts: Don’t Ignore the Basics
Modern automation tools are powerful, but they are not magic. Script failures are not just problems, but they are indications to help us build better software.
As we move forward with AI and automation, let’s not forget what really matters: delivering high-quality products that users can trust. And sometimes, the best way to do that is by learning from the failures we’d rather ignore.